How Can We Help?

All Knowledge Base

Categories
<Go Back
Print

PMP Practice Questions #108

You are managing a large-scale software development project that was initially planned using a predictive (waterfall) methodology. As the project progresses, it becomes evident that the requirements are more dynamic than initially anticipated, with frequent changes and adjustments needed. The current waterfall approach is proving to be inflexible and is causing delays and increased costs. Considering these challenges, how should you proceed with the project’s lifecycle approach?

A. Continue with the predictive methodology, as changing the approach mid-project could lead to more confusion and disruption.
B. Switch to an agile methodology immediately to better accommodate the changing requirements and enhance flexibility.
C. Conduct a thorough analysis to assess the feasibility and implications of transitioning to a more agile approach at this stage of the project.
D. Split the project into smaller parts, applying a predictive approach to stable parts and agile to parts with dynamic requirements.

Analysis:

The scenario presents a software development project initially planned with a predictive (waterfall) methodology facing challenges due to evolving requirements. The inflexibility of the waterfall approach is leading to delays and cost overruns. The project manager must decide how to adapt the project lifecycle to better handle these dynamic requirements.

Analysis of Options:

Option A: Continue with the predictive methodology, as changing the approach mid-project could lead to more confusion and disruption. This option suggests sticking with the current approach despite its shortcomings. However, continuing without addressing the methodological misfit could exacerbate project issues, underscoring the need for adaptability in project management practices.


Option B: Switch to an agile methodology immediately to better accommodate the changing requirements and enhance flexibility. Opting for an immediate switch to Agile proposes a radical shift to enhance flexibility and responsiveness. Yet, the abrupt change without adequate preparation or analysis could disrupt project continuity and stakeholder alignment.


Option C: Conduct a thorough analysis to assess the feasibility and implications of transitioning to a more agile approach at this stage of the project. This option is strategic, offering a pathway to evaluate the project’s current state against the potential benefits and challenges of adopting a more agile or hybrid methodology. It underscores the importance of a deliberate, informed decision-making process, allowing for a careful consideration of various project factors. By not immediately committing to a full agile transition, it provides room to explore a tailored approach that might blend the strengths of both predictive and agile methodologies. This reflective and analytical step ensures any shift in methodology enhances project adaptability without sacrificing the project’s established goals and stakeholder expectations.


Option D: Split the project into smaller parts, applying a predictive approach to stable parts and agile to parts with dynamic requirements. Applying different methodologies to various project segments based on their stability and dynamic requirements suggests a tailored approach. However, like Option C, it necessitates careful planning and analysis to ensure coherence and effectiveness.

Conclusion: Option C emerges as the most prudent course of action, advocating for a comprehensive assessment of the project’s requirements and challenges before making a methodology shift. This analysis paves the way for a possible transition to agile methodologies or the adoption of a hybrid model, depending on the findings. It acknowledges the need for flexibility in responding to dynamic project requirements while considering the project’s foundational aspects and stakeholder expectations. Ultimately, this approach leaves room for adopting Options A, B, or D, based on a detailed evaluation and alignment with the project’s evolving needs, ensuring a methodical and strategic response to the project’s challenges.

PMP Exam Content Outline Mapping

DomainTask
DomainTask
ProcessTask 13: Determine appropriate project methodology/methods and practices

Topics Covered

  • Project Life Cycle Selection

Was this article helpful?
5 out of 5 stars

1 rating

5 Stars 100%
4 Stars 0%
3 Stars 0%
2 Stars 0%
1 Stars 0%
Please Share Your Feedback
How Can We Improve This Article?